![]() ![]() Appellant Tyler Ray Pauli was charged with four counts of possession of pornographic work involving minors in violation of Minn. The warrantless search of defendant’s personal online cloud storage account did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the search by law enforcement officers did not exceed the scope of the private search performed by an employee of the online cloud storage account company. The Minnesota Rules of Evidence do not apply with full force during suppression hearings. When a defendant moves to suppress the evidence obtained from a warrantless search and the State proves that the private search doctrine applies, the burden to show that the private party was acting on behalf of the government falls on the party seeking suppression of the evidence. Granick, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, San Francisco, California for amici curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union, and American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota. Flaherty, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota and Jennifer Lynch, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, California and Teresa Nelson, American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota and Jennifer S. Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Laura Heinrich, Assistant Public Defender, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for appellant. ![]() _ Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Peter Magnuson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota and Mark Rubin, Saint Louis County Attorney, Duluth, Minnesota, for respondent. Filed: AugOffice of Appellate Courts Tyler Ray Pauli, Appellant. ![]() STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-1886 Court of Appeals McKeig, J. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |